Вот что у меня получилось.

  1) А где?

  2) Pontechium меня как-то не убедил. Почему на основании молекулярно-генетического анализа его выделили в отдельный род -- не понял. Может быть Lobostemon и Echiostachys включать в Echium? Echiostachys, если судить по фотографиям, вообще от синяка не отличить.

From our findings it becomes clear that the genus Echium in its present
circumscription (i.e., including E. maculatum) is biphyletic (Fig. 1), hence,
suggesting alteration of the taxonomy. Two options are possible (for further
discussion of monotypic genera, see Crisp & al., 1999): (1) To lump all species into
a large genus Echium s.l., which apart from Echium s.str. also includes
Echiostachys, Echium maculatum, and Lobostemon, these taxa then being treated as
subgenera. [A similar solution was once favoured by Johnston (1924); this would,
however, increase nomenclatural сonfusion in this taxonomically difficult group --
furthermore, merging all species into one genus would not at all reflect the distinct
evolutionary and distinct geographical patterns in the group]; (2) To treat
Echiostachys, Echium s.str., Echium maculatum, and Lobostemon as separate genera
(while further studies might later reveal if an independent genus Echiostachys is
justified).

 
А если серьёзно: Вы б хотя бы написали