The avenue of the road, profound and profound, profound and profound, the world is studying it. I am only curious about Zhouyi and have not studied it in depth. During the reading process, I found that there are three things to be discussed in the comments of Zhou Yi. Perhaps these three people have long discovered that only the first one is not concerned; the second one does not dare to mention; the third one mentions , but no one dares to modify. In the spirit of being responsible for Chinese traditional culture, I boldly challenged this field before I proposed the following three business. The first one is that the title is worthy of business. The Book of Changes is not called Yijing. The first is Yi. Later, people discovered that it was the beginning of the week, including the truth of the heavens and the earth. In addition, it was written by Zhou Wenwang of the Zhou Dynasty, and it was changed to "Book of Changes". Finally, because of Confucianism, "Book of Changes" , "Shangshu", "Book of Songs", "Ceremony" "Record" and "Spring and Autumn" are regarded as "the Five Classics" in order to highlight the status of the "jing", so the "Book of Changes" is changed to "Book of Changes." People think that "week" is just a symbol of the dynasty. It is not representative, so it will be removed. Since then, the Yijing has been renamed. However, Zhouyi has rarely been called this. This does not reflect the fundamental principle of Zhouyi. "Book of Changes" is known as "the first of the group , the source of the avenue." The key is the word "Book of Changes". It passes the sixty-four hexagrams and shows the law of everything going back and forth. Sixty-four Therefore, it is called "Book of Changes". The Zhou, the beginning and the end, also includes the meaning of the heavens and the earth; the Yi, the day is the sun, the day is the yang; the next is the month, the month is the yin, indicating the change of yin and yang. Coherence is the process of yin and yang change. Therefore, the Book of Changes cannot be called the Book of Changes. If this is the case, only the yin and yang changes will not be repeated, including the avenue of the universe. Can't sum up the whole picture of "Book of Changes". Of course, in the connoisseurs, "Zhou Yi" and "Book of Changes" have no meaning. They can be used by ordinary people here, or the title of "Book of Changes" is more appropriate. The second one is that the explanation is worthy of Shang Zhouyi. The principle is yin and yang, especially when explaining the phenomenon of yin and yang. There are two big shackles in Qiankun, which are clearly opposite to each other in terms of yin and yang, but the commentary is not relative. The original text is: Tian Xingjian, the gentleman to self-improvement; Kun Yu is: the terrain of Kun, the gentleman carries the virtues. If it is changed to: the day is done, the gentleman is self-improving; the terrain is Kun, the lady carries the virtues. It��s relative because it��s a commentary, it��s a health, I don��t know if it��s a mistake or a clerical error . "Jian is anonymity, how to explain the swearing? Dry to Kun, is the relative name on the shackles, but Kun �� has used the nickname, but it does not need to be anonymous, obviously it is necessary to discuss the relatives of the gentleman on the yin and yang. It is in accordance with the principle of Zhouyi. It is a yang, and it is right to match with a gentleman. Kun is a yin and still matches with a gentleman. If you follow the original text of the commentary, there is only a gentleman to the gentleman in the world. Ladies match, how does this humanity multiply? How does everything still live? How is it consistent with the principle of "Book of Changes"? The third is "Original Biography" worthy of the "Zhou Yi" original text , no one can be picky, only the order Chuan, because the text is poor, the superficial explanation is extremely inconsistent with the integrity of the "Book of Changes". There have been many doubts about the scholars of Yiyi! For example: Han Kangbo believes: "The description of the preface is not the meaning of "easy". "Ye Shizhen was destroyed as: "Shallow . Kang Youwei smashed into: "superficial", etc., so the suspicion is a fake. Because he did explain the relationship between 64 ,, there is still a certain reference value, so it was retained. Han Kangbo's Meaning: As explained in the preface, there is no implication of "Book of Changes". It does not meet the requirements of the overallity of "Book of Changes". Based on this, I refer to the full text of "Book of Changes" and make necessary modifications to the original sequence. Although I dare not say that it is perfect, but at least it is much better Related articles:
*
Zbio-wiki
Правила
* The avenue of
ylq
13.06.2019 09:44
