Пипетки надо мыть с мылом

  Слушал доклад вживую. Сначала, честно говоря о*уел. Потом конечно прояснилось. Могу фото ключевых слайдов выложить, если кому интересно.

  это квантовая телепортация ДНК, пишет New Scientist.

  Что то не могу найти в New Scientist статью на эту тему

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02624079

Scorn over claim of teleported DNA

  Регистрацию сцуко требует

Scorn over claim of teleported DNA
12 January 2011 by Andy Coghlan
Magazine issue 2795. Subscribe and save
For similar stories, visit the Quantum World Topic Guide
Editorial: "Why we have to teleport disbelief"

A Nobel prizewinner is reporting that DNA can be generated from its teleported "quantum imprint"

A STORM of scepticism has greeted experimental results emerging from the lab of a Nobel laureate which, if confirmed, would shake the foundations of several fields of science. "If the results are correct," says theoretical chemist Jeff Reimers of the University of Sydney, Australia, "these would be the most significant experiments performed in the past 90 years, demanding re-evaluation of the whole conceptual framework of modern chemistry."

Luc Montagnier, who shared the Nobel prize for medicine in 2008 for his part in establishing that HIV causes AIDS, says he has evidence that DNA can send spooky electromagnetic imprints of itself into distant cells and fluids. If that wasn't heretical enough, he also suggests that enzymes can mistake the ghostly imprints for real DNA, and faithfully copy them to produce the real thing. In effect this would amount to a kind of quantum teleportation of the DNA.

Many researchers contacted for comment by New Scientist reacted with disbelief. Gary Schuster, who studies DNA conductance effects at Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, compared it to "pathological science". Jacqueline Barton, who does similar work at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, was equally sceptical. "There aren't a lot of data given, and I don't buy the explanation," she says. One blogger has suggested Montagnier should be awarded an IgNobel prize.

Yet the results can't be dismissed out of hand. "The experimental methods used appear comprehensive," says Reimers. So what have Montagnier and his team actually found?

Full details of the experiments are not yet available, but the basic set-up is as follows. Two adjacent but physically separate test tubes were placed within a copper coil and subjected to a very weak extremely low frequency electromagnetic field of 7 hertz. The apparatus was isolated from Earth's natural magnetic field to stop it interfering with the experiment. One tube contained a fragment of DNA around 100 bases long; the second tube contained pure water.

After 16 to 18 hours, both samples were independently subjected to the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), a method routinely used to amplify traces of DNA by using enzymes to make many copies of the original material. The gene fragment was apparently recovered from both tubes, even though one should have contained just water (see diagram).

DNA was only recovered if the original solution of DNA - whose concentration has not been revealed - had been subjected to several dilution cycles before being placed in the magnetic field. In each cycle it was diluted 10-fold, and "ghost" DNA was only recovered after between seven and 12 dilutions of the original. It was not found at the ultra-high dilutions used in homeopathy.

Physicists in Montagnier's team suggest that DNA emits low-frequency electromagnetic waves which imprint the structure of the molecule onto the water. This structure, they claim, is preserved and amplified through quantum coherence effects, and because it mimics the shape of the original DNA, the enzymes in the PCR process mistake it for DNA itself, and somehow use it as a template to make DNA matching that which "sent" the signal (arxiv.org/abs/1012.5166).

"The biological experiments do seem intriguing, and I wouldn't dismiss them," says Greg Scholes of the University of Toronto in Canada, who last year demonstrated that quantum effects occur in plants. Yet according to Klaus Gerwert, who studies interactions between water and biomolecules at the Ruhr University in Bochum, Germany, "It is hard to understand how the information can be stored within water over a timescale longer than picoseconds."

It is hard to understand how the information can be stored in water for more than picoseconds
"The structure would be destroyed instantly," agrees Felix Franks, a retired academic chemist in London who has studied water for many years. Franks was involved as a peer reviewer in the debunking of a controversial study in 1988 which claimed that water had a memory (see "How 'ghost molecules' were exorcised"). "Water has no 'memory'," he says now. "You can't make an imprint in it and recover it later."

Despite the scepticism over Montagnier's explanation, the consensus was that the results deserve to be investigated further. Montagnier's colleague, theoretical physicist Giuseppe Vitiello of the University of Salerno in Italy, is confident that the result is reliable. "I would exclude that it's contamination," he says. "It's very important that other groups repeat it."

In a paper last year (Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences, DOI: 10.1007/s12539-009-0036-7), Montagnier described how he discovered the apparent ability of DNA fragments and entire bacteria both to produce weak electromagnetic fields and to "regenerate" themselves in previously uninfected cells. Montagnier strained a solution of the bacterium Mycoplasma pirum through a filter with pores small enough to prevent the bacteria penetrating. The filtered water emitted the same frequency of electromagnetic signal as the bacteria themselves. He says he has evidence that many species of bacteria and many viruses give out the electromagnetic signals, as do some diseased human cells.

Montagnier says that the full details of his latest experiments will not be disclosed until the paper is accepted for publication. "Surely you are aware that investigators do not reveal the detailed content of their experimental work before its first appearance in peer-reviewed journals," he says.

How 'ghost molecules' were exorcised
The latest findings by Luc Montagnier evoke long-discredited work by the French researcher Jacques Benveniste. In a paper in Nature (vol 333, p 816) in 1988 he claimed to show that water had a "memory", and that the activity of human antibodies was retained in solutions so dilute that they couldn't possibly contain any antibody molecules (New Scientist, 14 July 1988, p 39).

Faced with widespread scepticism over the paper, including from the chemist Felix Franks who had advised against publication, Nature recruited magician James Randi and chemist and "fraudbuster" Walter Stewart of the US National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland, to investigate Benveniste's methods. They found his result to be "a delusion", based on a flawed design. In 1991, Benveniste repeated his experiment under double-blind conditions, but not to the satisfaction of referees at Nature and Science. Two years later came the final indignity when he was suspended for damaging the image of his institute. He died in October 2004.

That's not to say that quantum effects must be absent from biological systems. Quantum effects have been proposed in both plants and birds. Montagnier and his colleagues are hoping that their paper won't suffer the same fate as Benveniste's.

  Известно, что другои нобелевскии лауреат, которыи изобрел ПЦР вообще не верит в вирус иммунодефицита.

Electromagnetic signals are produced by aqueous nanostructures derived from bacterial DNA sequences
Luc Montagnier, Jamal Aïssa, Stéphane Ferris, Jean-Luc Montagnier and Claude Lavalléee


Abstract

A novel property of DNA is described: the capacity of some bacterial DNA sequences to induce electromagnetic waves at high aqueous dilutions. It appears to be a resonance phenomenon triggered by the ambient electromagnetic background of very low frequency waves. The genomic DNA of most pathogenic bacteria contains sequences which are able to generate such signals. This opens the way to the development of highly sensitive detection system for chronic bacterial infections in human and animal diseases.
Key words  DNA - electromagnetic signals - bacteria

  Да вроде о передаче электромагнитных сигналов ДНК Монтанье опубликовал статью еще два года назад:

http://www.springerlink.com/content/0557v31188m3766x/

  http://www.scienceblogs.de/weitergen/Monta...A-Sequences.pdf

Interdiscip Sci Comput Life Sci (2009)
DOI: 10.1007/s12539-009-0036-7

Editor-in-Chief

Dongqing Wei, Shanghai Jiaotong University, China

Executive Editor

Limin Angela Liu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China

Associate Editors

Joel S. Bader, Johns Hopkins University, USA

Liqun Chen, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China

Zizheng Gong, China Academy of Space Technology, Beijing, China

Hong Guo, University of Tennessee, USA

Zengjian Hu, Howard University, USA

Igor Jurisica, University of Toronto, Canada

Shaokai Luo, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China

Jean-Philip Piquemal, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, France

Qiushi Ren, Shanghai Jiaotong University, China

Russell Schwartz, Carnegie Mellon University, USA

Qingming Zhang, Beijing Institute of Technology, China

Editorial Board

Chairman

Luc Montagnier, World Foundation AIDS Research and Prevention, France

  Солидный журнал

  Существа,увы, нет

  http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1012/1012.5166v1.pdf

если вы как и я не сразу поняли куда смотреть

  Так глубокомысленно приведен список...  Ну и что?  По существу работы что-то можете сказать?

  По существу работы что-то можете сказать?

  «Шёл 1933 год. Однажды весной я наловила только что выклюнувшихся из икры головастиков и принесла в лабораторию. Беру одного и раздавливаю. Каплю крови и слизи раздавленного головастика кладу под микроскоп. Жадно, с нетерпением отыскиваю в поле зрения эритроциты.
Но что это? Взгляд мой впивается в какие-то шары. Навожу объектив микроскопа на резкость. Передо мной совершенно непонятная картина: среди вполне развитых клеток крови отчетливо различаю какие-то как бы недоразвитые клетки — мелкозернистые желточные шары без ядер, желточные шары поменьше, но уже с начинающим образовываться ядром. Казалось, что перед глазами полная картина рождения клетки…»

О. Б. Лепешинская. У истоков жизни. — М.-Л.: Детгиз, 1952

А вот что Лепешинская рассказывала взрослым, а не детям:
http://www.bioparadigma.spb.ru/lepeshiskaya2.htm

– А теперь, – сказал голос, – следующее. «Все – единое Я, это Я – мировое Я. Единение с неведением, происходящее от затмения света Я, исчезает с развитием духовности».
– А эта бредятина откуда? – спросил я. Я не ждал ответа. Я был уверен, что сплю.
– Изречения из «Упанишад», – ответил с готовностью голос.

  Да вроде о передаче электромагнитных сигналов ДНК Монтанье опубликовал статью еще два года назад:

http://www.springerlink.com/content/0557v31188m3766x/

Electromagnetic Signals from Bacterial DNA

Chemical reactions can be induced at a distance due to the propagation of electromagnetic signals
during intermediate chemical stages. Although is is well known at optical frequencies, e.g.
photosynthetic reactions, electromagnetic signals hold true for muck lower frequencies. In E. coli
bacteria such electromagnetic signals can be generated by electric transitions between energy levels
describing electrons moving around DNA loops. The electromagnetic signals between different bacteria
within a community is a “wireless” version of intercellular communication found in bacterial
communities connected by “nanowires”. The wireless broadcasts can in principle be of both the AM
and FM variety due to the magnetic flux periodicity in electron energy spectra in bacterial DNA
orbital motions.

...

In two recent and important experiments[2, 3], it was
shown that bacterial DNA macromolecules radiate electromagnetic
signals which were monitored employing the
voltage across an inductive pickup coil. The bacterial
DNA within water was located in a test tube. The pickup
coil was constructed with wires wrapped around the tube.
Our purpose is to theoretically discuss the biophysical
sources of these electromagnetic signals. The sources
are argued to be due to electronic transitions between energy
levels of electrons moving around the bacterial DNA
loops.

...

[2] L. Montagnier, J. AЁэssa, S. Ferris, J-L. Montagnier and C.
Lavallee, Interdiscip. Sci. Comput. Life Sci. 1, 81 (2009).
[3] L. Montagnier, J. AЁэssa, C. Lavallee, M. Mbamy, J. Varon
and H. Chenal, Interdiscip. Sci. Comput. Life Sci. 1, 245
(2009).

4. Wave transmission of DNA genetic information to water.
The next phase of the experimentation proved truly remarkable, for it comes close to challenging the tenet of biology, sometimes known as Redi’s principle, and also strongly defended by Pasteur, that all life comes from life (omne vivum ex vivo). Yet, a closer analysis will demonstrate that it is not the truth of the principle, but what we mean by “life” which is actually challenged by the results. In experiments reported by Montagnier at a 2010 conference in Lindau, a tube of pure water, when exposed to a second tube emitting signals, was made to emit signals, and then to cause DNA sequences placed into the pure water to assemble into sequences similar to those of the original emitting organism. Because of its importance we will summarize the experiment in as much detail as is available. As reported in a 2010 paper on the experiment, [L. Montagnier, J. Aissa, E. Del Giudice, C. Lavalee, A. Tedeschi, and G. Vitiello,“DNA waves and water.”] a fragment of DNA taken from the long terminal repeat of the AIDS virus (HIV) was used as the source. (The long terminal repeat is a portion of the DNA found in retroviruses that repeats itself many times over.) The fragment was then amplified by the PCR technique, in which a naturally derived enzyme, known as polymerase, artificially stimulates the DNA to reproduce many copies of itself when the nucleotides and other raw materials are supplied. Dilutions of the PCR-amplified DNA solution were then made, as in earlier experiments, until an electromagnetic signal was detected. The contents of the tube were then filtered through 450-nm and 20-nm porosity filters, and diluted from 10-2 to 10-15. A second tube containing pure water was subjected to the same filtration and dilutions. The tubes were then placed near to one another inside a horizontally oriented copper coil or solenoid (Figure 3). The solenoid and tubes are placed inside a container shielded by a 1-mm-thick layer of mu-metal. A low-intensity electric current oscillating at 7 Hz was then fed to the solenoid from an external generator for 18 hours at room temperature. When the tube containing pure water was removed after 18 hours, it was found to emit signals, as did the tube containing the diluted filtrate of viral DNA. No emission occurred under the following conditions:
• Time of exposure less than 16-18 hours
• No coil
• Generator turned off
• Frequency of excitation less than 7 Hz
• Absence of DNA in the first tube.
Now comes the most remarkable step. The ingredients for synthesizing DNA by the polymerase chain reaction (nucleotides, primers, polymerase) were added to the tube containing the pure water. It is expected that the PCR reaction should require the presence of at least one copy of the DNA segment which is to be reproduced, to serve as an initial template for DNA amplification. This was not added. The PCR reaction was then performed in the usual way by cycled exposure to heat. The result was that the DNA produced from the tube initially containing pure water was of the expected size and 98 percent identical in sequence to the original DNA sequence from the long terminal repeat of the HIV. Out of 104 nucleotides (the molecules which join together to make up the DNA structure), only two were different from the original. The experiment was reproducible and successful in 12 out of 12 tries. It was successfully repeated with a DNA sequence from a bacterium, Borrelia burgdorferi, the spirocspirochete responsible for Lyme disease.